🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to follow this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

While this international conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others show that policymakers globally are no longer content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.