🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin him for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.